cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
STT Jaffray
Contact Email
sttjaffraymakassar@yahoo.co.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
sttjaffraymakassar@yahoo.co.id
Editorial Address
Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Sekolah Tinggi Theologia Jaffray Jalan Gunung Merapi No. 103 Makassar, 90114
Location
Kota adm. jakarta timur,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Jaffray
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Theologi Jaffray
ISSN : 18299474     EISSN : 24074047     DOI : -
Core Subject : Religion, Social, Engineering,
Religion Aerospace Engineering Social Sciences
Jurnal Jaffray adalah jurnal peer-review dan membuka akses yang berfokus pada mempromosikan teologi dan praktik pelayanan yang dihasilkan dari teologi dasar, pendidikan Kristen dan penelitian pastoral untuk mengintegrasikan penelitian dalam semua aspek sumber daya Alkitab. Jurnal ini menerbitkan artikel asli, review, dan juga laporan kasus yang menarik. Review singkat yang berisi perkembangan teologi, tafsiran biblika dan pendidikan teologi yang terbaru dan mutakhir dapat dipublikasi dalam jurnal ini.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 18, No 1 (2020): April 2020" : 4 Documents clear
Magic in Greco-Roman Era: A Historical Context to Understand Magic in the Acts of the Apostles Chandra Han
Jurnal Jaffray Vol 18, No 1 (2020): April 2020
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Theologia Jaffray

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25278/jj.v18i1.398

Abstract

Magic is an important topic in the New Testament but compared to other topics of discussion in New Testament Studies, the significance of the theme of magic has been unjustly undermined as indicated by David E. Aune. From the all eight occurrences of magic in the New Testament, four are found in the Acts of the Apostles. Therefore, the Acts of the Apostles is the most significant source to understand magic in the New Testament. The purpose of this thesis is to demonstrate the significant of magic in the Greco-Roman era as the historical context to understand magic in the Acts of the Apostles. Since Christianity flourished in the Greco-Roman era, the understanding of magic in the Greco-Roman era is significant to understand its confrontation with Christianity in the Acts of the Apostles. This article will analyze mainly the first source of magic in the Greek magical papyri, the definition of magic, its principles, and its spell related to the Acts of the Apostles, and the relation between magic and religion in Greco-Roman Era. The judgment on magic will then be provided in the end of this article as the foundation to further study of the Acts of the Apostles.
Norming the Norm of Relationality: A Theological and Interreligious Exploration of the Trinitarian Doctrine David Muthukumar Sivasubramanian
Jurnal Jaffray Vol 18, No 1 (2020): April 2020
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Theologia Jaffray

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25278/jj.v18i1.419

Abstract

Should all metaphysical reflections on the Trinity begin with the “substance/essence” ontology? This approach has frequently regression into metaphysical speculation, as in the historical theology of the Church. Are there alternative models that we can glean from the history of the Church that can provide a new means of conceptualizing the doctrine of the Trinity? This essay considers this issue at length to suggest a “relational ontology” paradigm in constructing the Trinitarian doctrine. It also makes use of Vishishtadvaita (Qualified Non-Dualism in Hindu philosophy) conception of “body-soul” analogy to render a “qualitative panentheistic” model in construing the doctrine of the Trinity. These theological and interreligious explorations are expected to shed more light on the issue.Haruskah semua refleksi metafisik tentang Trinitas bermula dengan ontologi “substansi/esensi”? Pendekatan ini seringkali menyebabkan kemunduran spekulasi metafisik, sebagaimana disaksikan dalam teologi sejarah gereja. Apakah ada model alternatif yang bisa kita ambil dari sejarah gereja yang dapat menyediakan cara baru untuk mengkonsepkan doktrin Trinitas? Esai ini mempertimbangkan isu ini panjang lebar untuk menunjukkan paradigma “ontologi relasional” dalam membina doktrin Trinitarian. Hal ini juga membuat penggunaan Vishishtadvaita (Kualifikasi Non-Dualisme dalam filsafat Hindu) konsepsi analogi “tubuh-jiwa” untuk membuat model “kualitatif panenteistik” dalam membangun doktrin Trinitas. Eksplorasi teologi dan keberagaman agama ini diharapkan lebih menjelaskan masalah ini.
Piety in Thoughts of John Wesley And Friedrich Schleiermacher Bobby Kurnia Putrawan; Ludwig Beethoven Jones Noya
Jurnal Jaffray Vol 18, No 1 (2020): April 2020
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Theologia Jaffray

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25278/jj.v18i1.426

Abstract

It is a misconception to identify modernity with secularization. When modernity simply creates the potential platform for secularization. On the one hand, modernity lessens the influence of piety to a minimum, and on the other hand, it restores piety and even modernizes piety without secularization. This essay focuses on telling the story of modernity in attempting to build a knowledge of God through the lens of piety. It centers on the work of two modern theologians: John Wesley and Friedrich Schleiermacher. The juxtaposition of Wesley and Schleiermacher is not without reason. Both of them are strongly influenced by the Moravian Brethren, which heavily emphasized a pietistic element in their community. This essay, however, will not explain the teaching of Moravian Brethren other than presenting their pietistic emphasis that was retained in Wesley and Schleiermacher's works. This essay argues that Schleiermacher's notion of a feeling of absolute dependence’ fills the rational gap of Wesleyan pietistic concept. It also discusses how the ‘Evangelical Revival/First Great Awakening’ and ‘Romanticism’ shaped Wesley and Schleiermacher, respectively, as they formulated their concept of piety. This essay is structured as follows. First, it presents the Evangelical Revival/First Great Awakening as the historical backdrop of Wesley's thought and continues with exhibiting Wesley’s concept of piety. Then, the essay describes the Romantic era and Schleiermacher's idea of piety.Adalah sebuah miskonsepsi untuk mengidentifikasi modernitas dengan sekularisasi, ketika modernitas hanya sekedar menciptakan panggung yang potensial untuk sekularisasi. Di satu sisi, modernitas mengurangi pengaruh kesalehan hingga taraf minimal, namun di sisi lain, modernitas memulihkan kesalehan. Makalah ini berfokus dalam menceritakan ulang kisah modernitas dalam upaya membangun pengetahuan akan Allah melalui lensa kesalehan. Makalah ini memusatkan diri pada karya dua teologi modern: John Wesley dan Friedrich Schleiermacher. Penjajaran Wesley dan Schleiermacher bukan tanpa alasan. Keduanya sangat dipengaruhi oleh Persaudaran Moravianyang sangat menekankan pada elemen kesalehan dalam komunitas mereka. Makalah ini, bagaimanapun, tidak menjelaskan pengajaran Persaudaraan Moravian selain menyajikan penekanan kesalehan yang dipertahankan dalam karya Wesley dan Schleiermacher. Makalah ini berupaya untuk menunjukkan bahwa gagasan Schleiermacher tentang perasaan akan ketergantungan absolut mengisi celah rasional dari konsep kesalehan John Wesley. Makalah ini juga membahas bagaimana Evangelical Revival/First Great Awakening dan Romantisisme membentuk Wesley dan Schleiermacher kala mereka merumuskan konsep kesalehan mereka masing-masing. Untuk mendukung argumen ini, makalah ini disusun sebagai berikut. Pertama, makalah ini menyajikan Evangelical Revival/First Great Awakening sebagai latar sejarah dari pemikiran Wesley dan dilanjutkan dengan menyajikan konsep kesalehan Wesley. Kemudian, makalah ini menjelaskan era Romantis dan konsep kesalehan Schleiermacher.
Transdisciplinary Research Bridges the Gap between Science and Pastoral Services Rampisela, Dorothea Agnes
Jurnal Jaffray Vol 18, No 1 (2020): April 2020
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Theologia Jaffray

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25278/jj.v18i1.411

Abstract

The flow of globalization has been unstoppable into most of the countries including Indonesia with this rapid transformation, the response must be integrated and comprehensive, involving all stakeholders from global governments, the public and private sectors to academics and the wider community. In this era, churches should unite in response to a changing context. Facing these challenges, teaching in universities and colleges is also demanded to change, including in producing quality scholars for future generations. What about Christian teaching and education? To what extent is it necessary or able to keep up with this global change? Is the role of theology or church school graduates still or will be increasingly needed? Transdisciplinary Action as new research policy is considered to be one of solution. The argumentative theory is used to verify whether transdisciplinary research is applicable and in line with Christian/ pastoral education and whether the transdisciplinary approachable to bridge the gap of science and the church service.  This argument concluded several reasons and evidence that transdisciplinary research will improve the quality of pastoral service so that it bridges science to transform into quality service.Arus globalisasi tidak dapat dicegah masuk ke hampir semua negara termasuk Indonesia. Dengan perubahan yang sangat cepat ini respons haruslah terpadu dan komprehensif, meliputi semua stakeholder mulai dari pemerintahan global, sektor publik dan swasta, akademisi dan komunitas masyarakat luas. Dalam era seperti ini, gereja harus bersatu dalam merespons konteks perubahan. Dalam mengahdapi tantangan ini, pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi juga diharapkan ikut berubah termasuk dalam menghasilkan sarjana berkualitas untuk generasi masa depan.  Bagaimana dengan Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Kristen? Sampai dimana hal ini masih dibutuhkan, dan apakah mampu bertahan dalam perubahan global ini? Apakah peran lulusan sekolah teologi atau gereja masih akan tetap semakin dibutuhkan? Aksi transdisiplinari sebagai arah penelititan terbaru dipertimbangkan sebagai salah satu solusi yang dapat dimanfaatkan. Teori argumentasi digunakan sebagai metode penelitian untuk membuktikan apakah penelitian transdisiplinari dapat diaplikasikan, dan sejalan dengan Pendidikan Kristen dan apakah pendekatan transdisiplin dapat menjembatani kesenjanganantara teori pengetahuan dan pelayanan gereja. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa ada beberapa alasan kuat serta bukti bahwa penelitian transdisiplin dapat meningkatkan mutu layanan gereja sehingga dianggap mampu menjembatani ilmu pengetahuan dan mentransformasikan menjadi layanan bermutu. 

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 21, No 2 (2023): October 2023 Vol 21, No 1 (2023): April 2023 Vol 20, No 2 (2022): October 2022 Vol 20, No 1 (2022): April 2022 Vol 19, No 2 (2021): October 2021 Vol 19, No 1 (2021): April 2021 Vol 18, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Jaffray 18, no. 1 April 2020 Vol 18, No 2 (2020): October 2020 Vol 18, No 1 (2020): April 2020 Vol 17, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 17, no. 1 April 2019 Vol 17, No 2 (2019): Oktober 2019 Vol 17, No 1 (2019): April 2019 Vol 16, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 16, no. 1 April 2018 Vol 16, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 16, no. 1 April 2018 Vol 16, No 2 (2018): Oktober 2018 Vol 16, No 1 (2018): April 2018 Vol 15, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 15, No. 2 Oktober 2017 Vol 15, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 15, No. 2 Oktober 2017 Vol 15, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 15, No.1 April 2017 Vol 15, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 15, No.1 April 2017 Vol 15, No 2 (2017): Oktober 2017 Vol 15, No 1 (2017): April 2017 Vol 14, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 14, No. 2 (Oktober 2016) Vol 14, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 14, No. 2 (Oktober 2016) Vol 14, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 14, No. 1, April 2016 Vol 14, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 14, No. 1, April 2016 Vol 14, No 2 (2016): Oktober 2016 Vol 14, No 1 (2016): April 2016 Vol 13, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 13 No. 2 Oktober 2015 Vol 13, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 13, No. 2 Oktober 2015 Vol 13, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 13 No. 1 April 2015 Vol 13, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 13 No. 1 April 2015 Vol 13, No 2 (2015): Oktober 2015 Vol 13, No 1 (2015): April 2015 Vol 12, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 12 No. 2 Oktober 2014 Vol 12, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 12 No. 2 Oktober 2014 Vol 12, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 12 No. 1 April 2014 Vol 12, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 12 No. 1 April 2014 Vol 12, No 2 (2014): Oktober 2014 Vol 12, No 1 (2014): April 2014 Vol 11, No 2 (2013): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 11 No. 2 Oktober 2013 Vol 11, No 2 (2013): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 11 No. 2 Oktober 2013 Vol 11, No 1 (2013): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 11 No. 1 April 2013 Vol 11, No 1 (2013): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 11 No. 1 April 2013 Vol 11, No 2 (2013): Oktober 2013 Vol 11, No 1 (2013): April 2013 Vol 10, No 2 (2012): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 10 No. 2 Oktober 2012 Vol 10, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 10 No. 1 April 2012 Vol 10, No 2 (2012): Oktober 2012 Vol 10, No 1 (2012): April 2012 Vol 10, No 2 (2012): Vol 10, No 1 (2012): Vol 9, No 2 (2011): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 9 No. 2 Oktober 2011 Vol 9, No 1 (2011): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 9 No. 1 April 2011 Vol 9, No 2 (2011): Oktober 2011 Vol 9, No 1 (2011): April 2011 Vol 9, No 2 (2011): Vol 9, No 1 (2011): Vol 8, No 2 (2010): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 8 No. 2 Oktober 2010 Vol 8, No 2 (2010): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 8 No. 2 Oktober 2010 Vol 8, No 1 (2010): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 8 No. 1 April 2010 Vol 8, No 2 (2010): Oktober 2010 Vol 8, No 1 (2010): April 2010 Vol 7, No 2 (2009): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 7 No. 2 Oktober 2009 Vol 7, No 2 (2009): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 7 No. 2 Oktober 2009 Vol 7, No 1 (2009): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 7 No. 1 April 2009 Vol 7, No 1 (2009): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 7 No. 1 April 2009 Vol 7, No 2 (2009): Oktober 2009 Vol 7, No 1 (2009): April 2009 Vol 6, No 2 (2008): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 6, No. 2, Oktober 2008 Vol 6, No 2 (2008): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 6, No. 2, Oktober 2008 Vol 6, No 2 (2008): Oktober 2008 Vol 5, No 1 (2007): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 5, No. 1 Desember 2007 Vol 5, No 1 (2007): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 5, No. 1 Desember 2007 Vol 4, No 1 (2006): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 4, No. 1, Juni 2006 Vol 4, No 1 (2006): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 4, No. 1, Juni 2006 Vol 3, No 1 (2005): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 3, No. 1, Juni 2005 Vol 3, No 1 (2005): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 3, No. 1, Juni 2005 Vol 2, No 2 (2004): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 2, No. 2 Desember 2004 Vol 2, No 2 (2004): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 2, No. 2 Desember 2004 Vol 2, No 1 (2004): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 2, No. 1 Juni 2004 Vol 2, No 1 (2004): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 2, No. 1 Juni 2004 Vol 1, No 1 (2003): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 1, No. 1, Juni 2003 Vol 1, No 1 (2003): Jurnal Jaffray Volume 1, No. 1, Juni 2003 More Issue